It was a tough week
for the European Union. In the elections to its parliament, a phenomenal growth
in the strength of the racist and xenophobic parties, which dream of turning
back the clock of unity; closing down the open borders; pushing Europe to dark
days which we thought were safely left behind. The most pan-European of bodies,
whose members are directly elected by the citizens of all European countries, turned
into a springboard for its foes.
Some of them hate
Muslims and some hate Gypsies and some hate Blacks and some hate Jews and some
do not really like Jews but do admire Israel, especially when Israel hits out
at Arabs and Muslims, and some of them just hate on general principle anyone who is
strange and different. It is not sure that when they all sit in the European
Parliament they could or would agree on whom to hate.
Though in several countries
- particularly in France –xenophobic parties made remarkable and frightening strides,
at least, in none of the countries is such a party taking part in government. In
the State of Israel we have them in government. On some occasions it seems that
they are the government.
This was also the
week when we had a prominent visitor from Europe, Pope Francis who is in fact
originally Argentine. Not
just a Pope, but one who managed to arouse quite a lot of sympathy and hope even
among those who are not Christians, and to restore the reputation of the Catholic
Church which had been at a low ebb. It was clear from the outset that each step
which the Pope would take around here, among the Palestinians as among the
Israelis, would be examined in minute detail, and that every word he utters
would be endowed with a symbolic - and political - meaning.
"The long
conflict had caused many wounds which are difficult to heal. The time has come to put an end to this situation,
which is becoming ever more unacceptable. Everybody concerned must exhibit courage,
generosity and creativity, in order to promote the common good. Courage is
needed for a peace based on the recognition of the right of two states to exist
and to enjoy the peace and security in internationally recognized borders.
Hopefully, all parties shall refrain from actions that are contrary to the
stated desire to reach a real agreement."
It can be assumed
that the speech broadcast from Bethlehem was not really palatable to Israel’s Prime
Minister Netanyahu, and that he did not like the reference to "the good
relationship between the Holy See and the State of Palestine". But what
really set him off was the moment when the Papal cavalcade made an “unscheduled”
halt at the Separation Wall erected by the State of Israel deep in Palestinian
territory, and when the Pope descended and touched the ugly concrete right next
to where the "Free Palestine " graffiti had been scrawled and made there
a short silent prayer. From what I hear from the US, there had been some effort
to dissuade the American media from publishing the photo of this moment, and to
place instead the more predictable one of the Pope at the stones of the Wailing
Wall. To no avail: the New York Times published both of them, side by side...
Nominally, there was
a total draw. Israel got from the Pope a counter-balancing gesture for any move
he made towards the Palestinians - including the first-ever laying a of a Papal
wreath on the grave of the founder of Zionism, Theodor Herzl. A century ago,
when the living Herzl visited the Vatican, he got a far from friendly reception
from an earlier Pope. Still, the veteran commentator Eitan Haber, once an advisor
to PM Rabin, concluded that the Palestinians had won this round of the PR war.
And there was also
the bunch of extreme rightists in Jerusalem who waved the signs "Unholy Pope,
don’t you dare set foot on the soil of our country!" and fought the police
who prevented them from getting close to the visitor’s cavalcade. What particularly infuriated them was the Pope’s
prayer at the room where according to Christian tradition the Last Supper had
taken place, and which is located in the building which Judaism as well as Christianity
(and Islam, too…) identify as the Tomb of King David.
"Hands off Our Land
of Israel! Hands off Our David's Tomb! This is idolatry, anyone who had the
misfortune to be near the Pope must immediately have a ritual bath to be cleansed
of this contamination. This is a representative of the religion which had been slaughtering
us for 2014 years already. We don’t forget nor forgive the Inquisition and the
Crusades, how they slaughtered our grandfathers and grandmothers" exclaimed
Rabbi Baruch Efrati.
Indeed, the Christian
religion - the Catholic Church
in particular – has more than a few black pages in its history. But over
the past sixty years the Church has made a considerable effort to make amends
and change direction, and quite a bit more of that took place in the one year
since Pope Francis took office. During those same sixty years, the Rabbis and
religious leaders representing Judaism in Israel seem to have made a concerted
effort in the diametrically opposite direction,
and conjured the darkest days in the history of Judaism.
A little more than a
century ago the poet Shaul Tchernichovsky - himself a secularist – expressed a
longing for the "The Wondrous God of the Desert, the Lord of the Conquerors
who took Canaan by the Storm", a God who had been “made captive and tied
down with strips of phylacteries". Decades later, rabbis and religious leaders in
Israel realized Tchernichovsky’s dream turning it into a veritable nightmare.
The Lord of the Conquerors
of Canaan was duly released of all constraints and hindrances, set free to rampage
as he did three thousand years ago. After very many generations of a literary
and scholarly religion, whose sages spent lifetimes pondering Scriptures painstakingly
piling exegesis upon exegesis, a very different kind of religion was excavated
from deepest layers. The forgotten religion of the wild ancient tribes of the
desert, who took up the sword and invaded the settled land and took it by storm
and carried out a mass slaughter of its inhabitants. This religion is now being
offered with all seriousness as an exemplary way of life for the citizens of a
modern industrialized country, which maintains the most powerful army in the
Middle East and has at its disposal fleets of tanks and artillery pieces and fighter
jets as well as submarines sailing constantly under water with nuclear-headed
missiles ensuring Israel’s second- strike capability.
The holiest day of this
old-new religion is not inscribed in any traditional Scripture of the Jewish
religion. It is "Jerusalem Day", celebrated every year to mark “The Liberation
of Jerusalem". This year it fell just one day after Pope Francis boarded his
plane back to Rome - with the due farewell ceremony at the Airport. The main rite of Jerusalem Day is The
Dance of the Flags. Commemorating the day in 1967 when soldiers stormed into the
Old City of Jerusalem. Thousands and
tens of thousands of excited young people strove to recreate that tumultuous
day. Equipped with Blue-and-White flags and accompanied by hundreds of armed
police, they stormed into the alleys of the Old City, ceaselessly chanting:
"Muhammad is dead, Mohammed is dead! God damn the Arabs! Destroy the
mosques! Build the Temple! Death to the Arabs! Death to the Arabs! Death to the
Arabs! "
The police ordered
all Arab shopkeepers on the route of the march to close and lock their shop
ahead of the arrival of the dances and their flags, and in general advised all
Arab residents to stay indoors until the storm passes. But this year there were
quite a few young Palestinians who ignored the police’s generous advice.
Rather, they stood at the entrance to the Damascus Gate, the focus of
Palestinian daily life in the Old City, and raised their own flags, Black-White-Green-and-Red, in the face of the Blue-and-White dancers.
Whereupon the police immediately rushed and dragged them (the Palestinians, of course) into
custody on charges of disturbing public order. There were also numerous riots
and clashes at the most sensitive spot in Jerusalem – the Mosque Compound which
is the third holiest site for a billion Muslims around the world, the mosques
which the Flag Dancers dream of destroying and razing - to make room for reconstruction
of the Temple which was destroyed by the Roman legions in 70 AD.
Israel’s State TV reported
on “A day of celebration in Jerusalem" and interviewed an enthusiastic young
woman twirling a flag and saying "Peace will come only when Jerusalem is
ours, Jewish and Jewish only, Forever!". She was followed by footage from the speech of
Prime Minister Netanyahu who said more or less the same. The reporter noted
briefly that "Festivities of Jerusalem Day were marred by several violent incidents"
(which viewers at home did not get to see). But… all this was not new, and for many Israelis, the real important evening news
came from the Tel Aviv fairgrounds, where artist Justin Timberlake performed to
a large and very excited audience.
Kalman Libeskind, one
of the most prominent columnist of the Israeli Right-Wing, wrote this week:
"We celebrate the Liberation of Jerusalem. Who is "we”? A good
question . Broadly, one can say Jerusalem Day remains a day of celebration for
Religious Zionists and for them only. Those who wear the knitted skullcap go
the synagogue with white shirts and make solemn prayers, praise the Creator and
send tens of thousands of their children to the traditional Dance of the Flags.
For the secular part of the public, and certainly for the Israeli Left, this
day hardly exists in the calendar."
The industrious Libeskind
went to the press archive and checked the newspapers of June 1967, and found
that at that time the nationalist euphoria caught up virtually everybody. Even "Ha’aretz"
published an editorial full of nationalistic and even messianic rhetoric about “The
Liberation of the Old City, which will be our forever". So what has
happened since?
"Maybe the Occupation
does have a part in this process" admits Libeskind. "At first they
told us that they love the country as much as anyone else. 'Do not preach to us
and tell us what Love of the Homeland is’ they cried out. ‘The fact that we are
ready to divide Jerusalem and in exchange for peace give away Hebron, the City
of the Patriarchs, in no way detracts from our love for and attachment to these
places, from our commitment to Jewish history. Which was true. Then. Maybe. But
in order to disengage even more from the extremists who talked about the Land
of Israel in terms of love and holiness, the Peace Camp went through a complex
mental process of disengagement , desiring to push themselves as far away as possible.
When Geula Cohen spoke lovingly of Hebron, they developed a loathing for the
place. When the Nationalist Camp linked themselves to Jerusalem and danced with
national flags at the Wailing Wall and aspired to ascent to Temple Mount , they
barricaded themselves in Tel Aviv and pushed away the national flag in order to
reject any similarity to these Fascists."
Broadly, I have no
quarrel with Libeskind’s analysis.
This week we were
also visited by the American Jewish writer Ayelet Waldman, who bears an Israeli
Hebrew first name and who once tried to live in Israel and left after a short
time. In an extensive interview to Haaretz, she talked among other things of
her fears of an outbreak of Antisemitism in America. Which of course prompted the
interviewer to ask: “So, maybe one day you will want to escape to
Israel?". Waldman's response: "If in the meantime you don’t destroy
everything here, if something is still left after Netanyahu and all his friends
are done."
