It
was last week that the White House charged that the burst of settlement
construction in East Jerusalem was “poisoning the atmosphere”, with Netanyahu
riposting by accusing the President of the United States of "Un-American
Behavior". By this week the storm
center had shifted to Europe with the newly elected Prime Minister of Sweden
devoting to our region a prominent place in his first parliamentary address. "The
conflict between Israel and Palestine can only be solved with a two-state
solution, negotiated in accordance with international law. A two-state solution
requires mutual recognition and a will to peaceful co-existence" said
Prime Minister Lofven.
Official Israel cried out furiously, and the Swedish Ambassador was
invited to a disciplinary meeting at the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem. (This
time no low chair for the chastened Ambassador, as had been offered to his Turkish colleague at another occasion...). And Foreign
Minister Avigdor Lieberman managed to publish an article in an important
Swedish newspaper, asserting that the country’s new Prime Minister had not
intended to promote peace between Israel and the Palestinians but appease
public opinion in Sweden. (This implies that Lieberman acknowledges Swedish
public opinion tends to side with the Palestinians and demands a government
action on their behalf - and perhaps not only in Sweden ...). Activists of
extreme right groups called for a boycott of IKEA and other Swedish products.
For his part, Yitzhak Herzog of the Israeli Labor Party “opposition" was
mobilized for an effort to lobby Lofven, his long-time fellow member of the Socialist
International, and dissuade him from recognizing the State of Palestine.
Still,
the disease is spreading, and next week the British Parliament is about to vote
on the issue of recognizing the State of Palestine. "We feel that now's the time to shout out loud that
this should be done," said lawmaker Grahame Morris from the (British) Labor
Party. The results
of the vote would not bind the British government to change its current policy,
but certainly they may influence the climate of public opinion in Britain.
Meanwhile,
in East Jerusalem the conflagration which started during the hot weeks before
the war in Gaza still goes on. Demonstrations and riots and clashes with police
continue and this week the flames touched on the compound of the mosques of
Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif, one of the world’s most sensitive and volatile spots.
And at the same time the government of Israel was forced by international
pressure to allow the ministers of the Palestinian Reconciliation Government – to
whose creation Netanyahu had been strongly
opposed – get to the Gaza Strip and take the careful first step towards mending
the deep rift among the Palestinian people.
Under
the media radar wich remains focused on diplomatic storms and conspicuous
riots, Israeli soldiers arrived this week at the village of Khirbet Um al-Jimal,
east of Tubas in the Jordan Valley. A tiny village which does not appear on any
map, since from the official Israeli point of view it should not exist and its
continued existence is an error which needs to be rectified. The soldiers told
the villagers that all village homes were to be destroyed and presented them
with demolition orders duly signed by the military governor. The soldiers then took
photos of the doomed buildings (to be precise, huts and sheds) from all
directions, in order to facilitate the demolition crews’ work. The residents were not told the intended date of destruction, the Israeli Defense Forces prefer to
keep the advantage of surprise. On some day next week or next month, the
soldiers will come back, accompanied by bulldozers and the demolitions will be
implemented with alert soldiers holding their weapons ready in case anyone
dares to resist.
Why
should the State of Israel act so harshly against such a small village which
does not pose any visible threat to its security? Well, Khirbet Um al-Jimal is located
in the Jordan Valley, and the current Israeli government - like its
predecessors - wishes to perpetuate Israeli control of the Jordan Valley in any
future agreement (and also if no agreement is ever signed). This tiny Palestinian village, as well as a few other
villages in the same area, is interfering by its existence with the fulfillment
of these plans, and therefore the soldiers and bulldozers and demolition orders
are sent. But though they are but a handful of desperately poor Palestinian
villagers, the inhabitants of Khirbet Um al-Jimal are not completely helpless. Already
several times this small village was razed and destroyed, and each time the
residents rebuilt their meager huts and sheds as soon as the soldiers and
bulldozers departed. It's not so much because they are determined to confront
and defy strategic plans of the government of Israel and its armed forces. It is
mainly because this god forsaken small
village is their home and they have nowhere else to go.
On
the same day and almost at the same hour when the soldiers reached Khirbet Um
al-Jimal, the Swedish Ambassador Carl Magnus Nesser arrived at the Foreign
Ministry in Jerusalem. There, the Deputy Director European Affairs Aviv Shir-On
handed to him the official reprimand from the government of Israel: "The
statement by your Prime Minister about willingness to recognize a Palestinian
State is harmful, and we strongly object to it. It may create an expectation
among Palestinians to achieve their goals by unilateral acts rather than through
negotiations. "
Khirbet Um al-Jimal (photo: IMEMC)
The Swedish Parliament, Stockholm
(photo: Wikipedia)
